back to Plaguepuppy's homepage

How Strong Is The Evidence For A Controlled Demolition?

Quick navigation:

* Still photos

* Videos

* WTC-1

*WTC-2

*WTC-7

The destruction of the World Trade Center has been burned into popular consciousness as a series of endlessly repeated images of buildings collapsing in a remarkably precise manner, images whose repetition has reduced them to icons without their true true significance being fully addressed.  Given the scale of the disaster, the loss of life and the unique nature of the collapses, we would expect the most scrupulous possible treatment of the physical evidence from the collapse site to allow for future scientific analysis.  What happened instead was an unexplained decision by the city of New York to remove and recycle as much as possible of the structural steel as quickly as possible, scrubbing the crime scene of the great majority of the physical evidence.  The destruction of the World Trade Center has never been subjected to the scrutiny it deserves as a crime and as an unprecedented engineering failure, and an enormous amount of information crucial to a proper investigation has been irrevocably lost.

                 “Some 185,101 tons of structural steel have been hauled away from Ground Zero. Most of the steel has been recycled as per the city's decision to swiftly send the wreckage to salvage yards in New Jersey.  The city's hasty move has outraged many victims' families who believe the steel should have been examined more thoroughly. Last month, fire experts told Congress that about 80% of the steel was scrapped without being examined because investigators did not have the authority to preserve the wreckage.”   

 N.Y. Daily News, 4/16/02

 The first chapter of Eric Hufschmid’s book “Painful Questions” offers a more detailed discussion of this  extraordinary scrubbing of the crime scene.  

  And consider this remarkable statement from mayor Bloomberg:

New York authorities' decision to ship the twin towers' scrap to recyclers has raised the anger of victims' families and some engineers who believe the massive girders should be further examined to help determine how the towers collapsed. But New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg insisted there are better ways to study the tragedy of September 11. "If you want to take a look at the construction methods and the design, that's in this day and age what computers do," said Bloomberg, a former engineering major. "Just looking at a piece of metal generally doesn't tell you anything."

 From Eastday.com, 1/24/02 http://www.china.org.cn/english/2002/Jan/25776.htm

 

How is it possible that this uniquely horrific event has been subjected to so little rigorous investigation or forensic engineering analysis?   And what possible innocent motivation could there be for the great haste with which so much irreplaceable physical evidence was destroyed?

 Could there be something going on here that is so awful and yet so obvious that any serious investigation would threaten its exposure?  I believe that, even in the almost complete absence of physical evidence, there is enough photographic and video evidence and corroborating eyewitness reports to raise very serious questions about the official theories, and to point strongly to a controlled demolition.

A controlled demolition on this scale would of course imply the existence of a powerful and well-connected group of insiders with access to the buildings over a long period of time. And most important of all, they would have to be in enough positions of power and authority to ensure that there could be no real forensic analysis of the collapses, a task that was well and truly accomplished.

As we begin to look at the evidence that survived this purge, which comprises a considerable body of photos and video clips, we see more and more major objective features of the collapses that are simply not consistent with a gravitational collapse triggered by plane crashes and fires. The complex gestalt of first impressions is often our truest reading of a situation, the more so when that gestalt is informed by appropriate technical knowledge. For many people, including some of the leading demolition experts in their first unguarded moments, the initial appearance of the collapses alone left no question that these were controlled demolitions. I believe that this first impression was in fact a glimpse of the truth.
 
 

The Available Evidence
 
 

Still Photographs:
 
 

Gallery of Explosion Pictures

There are quite a few still pictures showing what can only be described as explosive ejections of material from the towers, pulverized concrete and shattered pieces of the steel perimeter columns thrown out even in the early stages of the collapses.  Some of these, for example the south tower pictures below, show clear rings of explosions running completely around the building just below the point of collapse.  In other pictures we see extremely energetic ejection of debris that simply cannot be accounted for by gravitational forces.  The immense volume of pulverized material generated early in the collapse gives rise to a phenomenon usually seen only in volcanoes, a pyroclastic flow that can be seen in some of the videos racing down the surrounding streets.

 


One of the best sources for still photos of the collapses and their aftermath is Here Is New York, the source of several of the pictures on this page.  This collection of pictures can be searched by topic, with a very large number of actual collapse pictures.  Many of these images show the explosive nature of the collapses, the violent ejection of large amounts of powdered concrete and shattered steel and the huge pyroclastic clouds formed.

WTC-1 collapse picture from Eric Huffschmid's "Painful Questions"
 

What is especially striking in the collapse of both towers is the enormous volume of material being ejected early in the collapse, and the quantity of shattered steel thrown out ahead of the dust clouds.  Much of this broken steel consists of neatly chopped one-story long pieces of the perimeter columns, 14" square steel box columns that are assembled in three-story sections.  These columns are also welded to 52" deep plates along each floor, but have somehow been broken free of these at the same time they are chopped up and ejected at high speed.   This combination of shattered debris with dust and smoke ejected at high speed makes for a textbook picture of the effects of high explosives.
 

The above is one of a remarkable  series of pictures taken by Bill Biggert, a photographer who was killed by the dust cloud from the WTC-1 collapse.  It shows large numbers of 12' sections of perimeter columns flying out ahead of the dust cloud in what is very clearly an explosive event.  He got very close to the North Tower just before it fell, and captured some amazing pictures of its collapse and of the previous damage from the WTC-2 collapse.  What is clear especially in Biggert's pictures is that the building is turning to dust as or even before it falls, as for example here.  Because so much very fine powder is produced very quickly and mixed with air, it becomes a pyroclastic cloud, capable of very rapid and destructive flow after falling from its original height.  This earlier article of mine (also referenced below) discusses the issue of pyroclastic flow as it applies to the WTC.

Videos Clips:

 

 The South Tower
 
 

2.8mb MPEG of collapse from the east

This is the most widely seen video of the WTC-2 collapse, seen from east and slightly north of the towers.  As can be seen in the still above, there are what appear to be rows of explosions on the east face at the level of the initial collapse, and the building begins to fall by toppling to the south.  The top section (~30 floors) continues tilting to the south, but quickly it can also be seen to start collapsing on itself, losing about half its height before the bottom of it reaches the bottom of the frame.  This article (originally at http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian) gives a good frame-by-frame analysis of the rows of explosions that precede the actual collapse, and discusses the rotation and collapse of the top section.  As the author notes it is very peculiar that the top section, having begun tilting to the south, did not continue to topple and land far to the south of the tower.  Needless to say, had this happened the damage to other buildings in the area would have been vastly greater.

Conservation of angular momentum requires that an object continue to rotate around its center of mass once set in motion, unless acted on by an outside force.  Even if the tower beneath it had completely given way, leaving it nothing more to push against laterally, the rotation once started would not abruptly stop.  But the top section does not stop rotating and drop straight down, as some have claimed.  What does in fact happen is that the top section breaks up internally so that it no longer behaves as a rigid object, relieving it of the obligation to conserve angular momentum..  By turning into a slurry of concrete dust and shattered steel the rotation becomes dissipated into the motion of what is essentially a fluid.  Why the top would collapse on itself in this manner is very difficult to explain on the basis of a simple plane damage and heat-induced collapse.  It would require the entire top section to lose all internal mechanical strength just at the moment it started to topple, at the same time that its thirty one-acre slabs of 4" thick concrete were turned to dust.  To accomplish this without explosives would be very difficult indeed.

Flashes from cutting charges?

A crucial detail in the above clip is a series of bright localized flashes that can be seen superimposed on various structural members just before they fail.  Further discussion can be found here: http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/Flashes/flashes.htm


Demolition waves

Close-up  of South Tower collapse

The link above is a capture of European broadcast video of the WTC-2 collapse, with the north tower in the foreground but shot from a little east of north so you can see quite a bit of the south tower. At the start of the collapse the south tower begins to lean to the south, away from us in this view, so there should be no significant compression (and possibly some traction, if the core has any resistance) on the side closest to us. This means that there is no way from the action of gravity to generate the high pressures it would take to pulverize and eject material in the manner seen. Instead of the kind of slow start we would expect near the beginning of a gravitational collapse we see high speed “demolition waves” coming directly toward us, with another set shooting out to the left, from the east side of the building. These are exactly the sort of confluent rows of small explosions that are so characteristic of a controlled demolition, and can be seen emerging in flat rings extending all the way around the tower and propagating rapidly downward.
 
 

-

Demolition wave - Divx codec needed to play

MPEG version of above

Slow-motion MPEG of beginning

 Explosive ejections early in the WTC-2 collapse can be seen even more clearly in this video, shot by Evan Fairbank from almost beneath the south tower.  Very energetic ejections of dust and debris occur floor by floor , moving rapidly down the tower.  He photographs the collapse briefly, then turns and runs from the pyroclastic cloud.  

 

Three views of the South Tower collapse from the southeast

A clip German television (SAT-1, Spiegel TV) showing three slightly different views of the WTC-2 collapse, all viewed from the south and close to the building.  Good close-ups of explosive events and other anomalies.
 

Two close-up views of the south tower collapse

ABC News Footage of the South Tower Collapse

A bit blurry but unique footage seen from very close to the WTC-2 collapse.  Excellent examples of dust trails and very clear views of demolition waves.


The North Tower

 

North Tower Collapse from the Northeast: This clip was part of a PAX/NBC compilation of views of the North Tower collapse, and is shot from east and a bit north of the tower, with the Woolworth Building in the foreground.  Notice the large number of small bright flashes that can be seen throughout the mushroom cloud as it unfolds, very similar to the flashes seen in the first WTC-2 footage seen above (www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/Flashes/flashes.htm).

 


Close-up of start of WTC-1 collapse: A broadcast video clip of the beginning of the North Tower collapse, seen from the north and a little west.  We clearly see that the collapse starts with the roof and antenna, which begin to move before anything else.  The antenna remains almost perfectly vertical as it descends, with bands of smoke blowing out in rings around the upper section of the tower.  A large jet of flame appears as the collapse moves down through the damaged area ~20 floors below the roof.  As the dust cloud settles we see the remains of perimeter columns a little to the right of center, a little to the right of where the corner of the building was, probably consisting of perimeter columns from the west wall.  These stand briefly, then seem to buckle and sag as they fall, trailing thick clouds of dust behind them.



Another close-up the top of WTC-1: This clip is from a remarkable silent documentary, "WTC The First 24 Hours".  It shows the North Tower from almost exactly due north, and is another fixed camera almost level with the top of the building.   About four seconds into the clip there is a strong ground tremor that shakes the building the camera is mounted on.  About 12 seconds after this the building begins to fall.
 
 

Smoke jets well below collapse level: This short clip of the North Tower collapse, taken from a 9-11 timeline done by KTLA in Los Angeles shows two sharply defined jets emerging from the side of the building.  Seen in profile, they extend far from the building while remaining as narrow streams.
 
 

Squibs in slow motion:  1.3mb .mpeg (above) and a 250k .mov  showing two localized puffs of smoke well below the actual collapse being ejected at high velocity.  These cannot be explained by pressure from the collapse, as they are taking place at a level too far below the actual collapse for pressure to be transmitted.  Their velocity and localization are most consistent with explosive charges within the buildings, perhaps large cutter charges on the core columns.
 
 

WTC-7


WTC-7, which collapsed on the afternoon of 9/11, looks like a classic controlled demolition, almost uncannily smooth.  The picture above links to a 12mb MPEG of the collapse taken from the Naudet brothers' documentary.  For those with limited bandwidth here is a smaller (3.8mb) version in animated GIF format.



Close-up of  squibs along southwest corner from the above video clip - notice the row of small squibs from cutting charges going off in sequence from bottom to top just as the building starts to fall.  

WTC-7 from West Broadway: Street-level view shows the dust and smoke blowing out from the bottom of the building as the top settles.
 
 

Edited MPEG - Collapse Only (1.3mb)

A live CBS broadcast (from the WJHL.COM video archive) with Dan Rather beginning just after WTC-7 falls, with a video replay of the collapse about one minute into the clip, repeated again later in the clip.  This is an interesting segment  that shows the collapse of WTC-7 in surprisingly good detail despite the small image size.  After some preliminary banter from Rather the replay of the collapse begins at about 58 seconds - this is when we first see the intact building.  At 63 seconds the left end of the "penthouse" on top of the building starts to fall, and by 64 seconds this small section is down, level with the other side of the roof.  There is no visible movement for six seconds, at which point the actual collapse begins.  At 70 seconds we see the top of the building begin to drop, and by 77 it appears to be all the way down.

This sort of collapse is  precisely what would be expected from a classical controlled demolition, with the charges going off at ground level to allow the building to settle into its own footprint.  Of all the collapses WTC-7 was the most precise, with almost all the wreckage confined to the footprint of the building.  It appears that some internal charges were set off to "adjust" the internal structure of the building for an orderly collapse, causing the left end of the penthouse to drop.  The building had an unusual design because it had to be built over an existing three story tall electrical substation, leading to a large transfer truss through the middle of the building above the electrical gear.  Such a non-homogeneous structure would not fall perfectly straight without some preparation.



Other Resources


Links to other video archives

From 9/11 Review - lots of good links...

 

Physics of WTC Collapse

This is a link to my earlier discussion of collapse dynamics, which was formerly hosted on the IndyMedia Ontario server.  In it I attempted to give a detailed but non-mathematical discussion of the significance of the pyroclastic flows seen in the WTC 1 and 2 collapses, as well as the physical significance of other anomalous features of the collapses.  (warning: most of the video links no longer work, but the same clips appear elsewhere on the site)

 
 

A look at the strange behavior of part of the North Tower core



Visit my homepage for new additions and related links:      

Plaguepuppy's Café